Georgia Online Poker in 2026: Laws and Options
Georgia has no regulated online poker and no casinos. Here is what the law actually says, why bills keep stalling, and where residents play now.
Read article →Maryland's iGaming push stalled again in 2026, leaving online poker unregulated. Here is where the law stands and what options players actually have.
Maryland has been one of the more frequently discussed iGaming prospects on the East Coast for several years running, largely because it sits between two states that already regulate online casino play and because its sports betting market launched without much drama. Every session brings a fresh round of speculation. Every session, so far, has ended the same way.
The 2026 session was no exception. Maryland finished the year with its gambling laws essentially unchanged: retail casinos and sports wagering licensed, online casino and online poker not authorised. For players in the state, that leaves a familiar and slightly awkward set of options, and it is worth being precise about what each one actually is. Our wider USA poker legality hub tracks the same questions state by state.
Start with what the state does regulate, because it is a reasonable amount.
What the state does not license is real-money online casino gaming, and online poker falls under that same umbrella. There is no Maryland-regulated poker site, no state-licensed operator offering cash games or tournaments to residents, and no interstate compact participation.
The 2026 attempt followed a pattern Maryland watchers will recognise. Because the state constitution requires voter approval to expand commercial gaming, iGaming legalisation needs two moving parts: a referendum bill to put the question to the electorate, and an implementation bill setting up the regulatory framework contingent on that vote passing.
Both pieces were introduced. The referendum measure was withdrawn by its sponsor in March, which effectively rendered the accompanying implementation bill moot — a regulatory statute contingent on a referendum that will not happen has nowhere to go. The session closed without an online casino framework, and iGaming was declared dead for the year.
This mirrors the 2024 attempt, where an iGaming bill cleared the House of Delegates before stalling in the Senate. The recurring obstacles are consistent and not especially mysterious: opposition from casino labour interests worried about the effect of online play on bricks-and-mortar employment, disagreement over tax rates and licence allocation, and the additional political weight of needing a statewide ballot question rather than a simple legislative vote.
Separately, Maryland has also seen legislative activity aimed at prohibiting sweepstakes-model casinos — part of a broader national trend of states moving against that category. That direction of travel matters for players, because sweepstakes sites have been the default workaround in states without regulated iGaming.
By 2026, a small group of states had legalised real-money online casino gaming — a list that includes Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and West Virginia. Regulated online poker specifically is available in an even narrower set, since not every iGaming state has a live poker product.
The distinction is worth holding onto. Online casino legalisation does not automatically produce online poker. Poker needs liquidity to function — a room with no players is worthless regardless of its licence — which is why the states that do offer it have generally needed either a large population or participation in a multi-state agreement to make the games viable. Our piece on shared liquidity between US states covers why that pooling matters so much.
Maryland's population would make it a plausible standalone market by the standards of some existing states, and it borders Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, all of which have regulated frameworks. If a bill ever passes, the geography is unusually favourable. That is precisely why the topic keeps returning each session.
With no regulated option, Maryland residents who want to play online poker are looking at offshore rooms — sites licensed in overseas jurisdictions that accept US players without holding a state licence.
It is important to be straightforward about what this means. These operators are not regulated by the Maryland Lottery and offer none of the consumer protections a state-licensed site would. Player funds are not segregated under state rules, there is no local regulator to appeal to in a dispute, and the recourse available if something goes wrong is limited to whatever the offshore licensing body provides.
At the same time, Maryland law has historically directed its enforcement attention at operators rather than individual recreational players, which is the pattern across most US states without regulated markets. That is a description of how enforcement has generally worked, not a guarantee about any individual's situation, and anyone with a specific legal question should ask a Maryland attorney rather than a poker site.
If you do decide to play, the practical due diligence is the same as anywhere: check how long the room has operated, how it handles cashouts, what its licensing arrangement actually is, and how it treats bonus terms. Our offshore licensing explainer walks through what the various jurisdictions do and do not mean, and the best poker bonuses page compares the offers at the rooms we cover.
Payment processing is generally the friction point for players in unregulated states, and Maryland is no different. Card deposits to offshore gambling sites are frequently declined by US issuers, which is a large part of why cryptocurrency has become the dominant funding method for this segment of the market.
Our bonus types guide covers how deposit matches and rakeback programmes differ across the rooms available to US players, which is the more consequential comparison once you have settled the banking question.
The Maryland iGaming question is not going away. The state's budget pressures give legislators an ongoing revenue argument, neighbouring states provide a visible template, and sponsors have shown they will keep reintroducing measures.
The realistic path remains a two-step one: a referendum bill surviving the session, a statewide vote, and only then an implementation framework. That sequencing means even a successful bill would be followed by a substantial delay before any site went live — and a further question about whether poker specifically would be included in the product mix or whether the focus would be slots and table games, as it has been in several other states.
For now, the position is simply stated: online poker is not regulated in Maryland, live poker in licensed casinos is, and anything online is an offshore proposition with the trade-offs that implies. We update our USA and Canada legality pages as sessions conclude, and our how to claim checklist covers getting bonus terms right if you do decide to open an account.
No. Maryland regulates retail casinos and sports betting but has not authorised online casino or online poker. iGaming bills again failed to advance in the 2026 session.
The state constitution requires voter approval to expand commercial gaming, so legalisation needs both a successful ballot question and a separate implementation statute.
Written by the OnlinePokerBonuses Editorial Team. This article is informational and does not constitute financial or legal advice.
Georgia has no regulated online poker and no casinos. Here is what the law actually says, why bills keep stalling, and where residents play now.
Read article →Washington has the strictest online gambling statute in the US. Here is what the law actually says, how it is enforced, and what it means for players.
Read article →Massachusetts has legal online sportsbooks but no regulated online poker. Here is what the law actually says and what players there use instead.
Read article →